4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com> [ Upstream commit 55556b0b2016806b2e16a20b62d143383983a34a ] do_not_expect_pk_fault() is a helper that we call when we do not expect a PK fault to have occurred. But, it is a function, which means that it obscures the line numbers from pkey_assert(). It also gives no details. Replace it with an implementation that gives nice line numbers and also lets callers pass in a more descriptive message about what happened that caused the unexpected fault. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michael Ellermen <m...@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> Cc: Ram Pai <linux...@us.ibm.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <sh...@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> Cc: linux...@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171338.55d13...@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c @@ -954,10 +954,11 @@ void expected_pk_fault(int pkey) last_si_pkey = -1; } -void do_not_expect_pk_fault(void) -{ - pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults); -} +#define do_not_expect_pk_fault(msg) do { \ + if (last_pkru_faults != pkru_faults) \ + dprintf0("unexpected PK fault: %s\n", msg); \ + pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults); \ +} while (0) int test_fds[10] = { -1 }; int nr_test_fds; @@ -1243,7 +1244,7 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16 pkey_assert(ret != -1); /* Now access from the current task, and expect NO exception: */ peek_result = read_ptr(plain_ptr); - do_not_expect_pk_fault(); + do_not_expect_pk_fault("read plain pointer after ptrace"); ret = ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, ignored, 0); pkey_assert(ret != -1); @@ -1287,7 +1288,7 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory */ madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED); lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch); - do_not_expect_pk_fault(); + do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory"); ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1); dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents); expected_pk_fault(pkey);
