On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 06:42:42 +0000 Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.g...@nxp.com> wrote:
> I have tried JFFS2 mounting with smaller partition size but still getting > failure. > For partition size equal or less than 1MB, getting errors as > [ 25.044930] jffs2: Too few erase blocks (4) > Thus, need to have size more than 1MB. > > For 2MB partition size getting error message from jffs2_scan_eraseblock(). > root@ls1012ardb:~# cat /proc/mtd > dev: size erasesize name > mtd0: 04000000 00040000 "20c0000.quadspi-0" > mtd1: 00500000 00040000 "rcw" > mtd2: 00a00000 00040000 "test" > mtd3: 00200000 00040000 "rootfs" > root@ls1012ardb:~# mkdir /media/ram ; flash_eraseall /dev/mtd3 > flash_eraseall has been replaced by `flash_erase <mtddev> 0 0`; please > use it > Erasing 256 Kibyte @ 1c0000 -- 100 % complete > root@ls1012ardb:~# mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock3 /media/ram/ > [ 26.380989] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not > found at 0x00000000: 0x0dd0 instead > [ 26.390509] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not > found at 0x0000004c: 0x7366 instead > [ 26.399999] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not > found at 0x00000050: 0x736c instead That's weird. Can you tell me on which platform you're testing? lsxxx or vf610? Can you dump the NOR after the erase to make sure the memory is actually erased (filled with 0xff)?
