[dropping Kirill Tkhai from the CC because I get rejection from the mail server]
On Fri 01-06-18 12:16:52, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 01:11:59PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Widening the definition of a process sounds good. The memory control > > group code would still need a way to forbid these in cgroup v1 mode, > > when someone uses the task file. > > Yeap, you're right. We'll need memcg's can_attach rejecting for v1. Do we really need? I mean, do we know about any existing usecase that would need this weird threading concept and depend on memory migration which doesn't really work? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
