Hi
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wah...@i2se.com> wrote:
>
>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx6ul-clock.h
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx6ul-clock.h
>>> @@ -242,20 +242,25 @@
>>> #define IMX6UL_CLK_CKO2_PODF 229
>>> #define IMX6UL_CLK_CKO2 230
>>> #define IMX6UL_CLK_CKO 231
>>> +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO1 232
>>> +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO2 233
>>> +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO3 234
>>> +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO4 235
>>> +#define IMX6UL_CLK_GPIO5 236
>>
>> this change looks like a breakage of devicetree ABI. You are changing the
>> mean of the existing clock IDs on i.MX6ULL, which probably regress the
>> combination of older DTBs with newer kernel.
>
> Good point! I will send a fix for f5a4670de96678 ("clk: imx: Add new
> clo01 and clo2 controlled
> by CCOSR") which did the same reordering.
>
ull is a preatty new platform so one board was listed. Are you sure
that we need?
Michael
> Thanks
--
| Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Amarula Solutions BV |
| COO - Founder Cruquiuskade 47 |
| +31(0)851119172 Amsterdam 1018 AM NL |
| [`as] http://www.amarulasolutions.com |
