Hi! > I also don't care about the details of how it gets > implemented, but when the AA people have a working > implementation, and the SELinux people are strongly > opposed to the concept, I don't see any advantage in
Actually, SELinux people 'liked' the concept -- they are willing to extend SELinux to handle new files better. And not only SELinux people are opposed to AA. > if the SELinux people had responded to the announcement > of AA with "that's a nice idea, if we add these snippits > from your code to SELinux then we can do the same thing" > it would be a very different story. It was something like 'is there description of AA security model? We'd like to take a look if we can do that within SELinux'. I tried to forward them pdf, but it was more AA implementation description (not AA model description) so it was probably not helpful. So yes, SELinux people want to help. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
