On Jun 14, 2007, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK. Let's take this to the simple and logical conclusion. A signed > filesystem image containing both GPL and non-GPL code. From your > point A, this is a derived work.
I claim the signature is derived from the GPLed bits, yes. Whether that's a derived work, in the legal sense, I'm not qualified to say. And I claim that, in the case of TiVO, it is not only a functional piece of the system that's derived from GPLed code and missing the corresponding sources, but also it's being used to impose restrictions on the exercise of the freedoms that the GPL is designed to protect. And these conditions are what make it a bad thing, and that deviate, if not from the legal conditions, at least from the spirit of the license. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
