4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>

commit f4a551b72358facbbe5714248dff78404272feee upstream.

By missing an "L", we might detect some addresses to be <8k,
although they are not.

e.g. for itdba = 100001fff
!(gpa & ~0x1fffU) -> 1
!(gpa & ~0x1fffUL) -> 0

So we would report a SIE validity intercept although everything is fine.

Fixes: 166ecb3 ("KVM: s390: vsie: support transactional execution")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] # v4.8+
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int pin_blocks(struct kvm_vcpu *v
 
        gpa = READ_ONCE(scb_o->itdba) & ~0xffUL;
        if (gpa && (scb_s->ecb & ECB_TE)) {
-               if (!(gpa & ~0x1fffU)) {
+               if (!(gpa & ~0x1fffUL)) {
                        rc = set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0080U);
                        goto unpin;
                }


Reply via email to