> Agree. We need to disable it, since folks do not read the docs > (obviously). Of course, we could leave it on, and I could start > charging money for these tools -- there's little doubt it would be a > lucrative business. Perhaps this is what I'll do if the numbers of > copies keeps growing. When it hits > 100 per week, it's taking a lot of > our time to support, so I will have to start charging for it. I am very firmly against removing something because people do not read manuals, what is next fdisk , mkfs ?. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Michael H. Warfield
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Peter Samuelson
- [PATCH] NTFS repair tools Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] NTFS repair tools Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] NTFS repair tools Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] NTFS repair tools Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: [PATCH] NTFS repair tools Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] NTFS repair tools Jeff Garzik
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Alan Cox
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Rik van Riel
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] David Woodhouse
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Jeff Garzik
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools] Ren Haddock