On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 11:46 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 11:14 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > If you suggest that I > > should stop caring about UV than I do so. Please post a patch that adds > > a dependency to UV on PREEMPT so that part of the architecture is > > documented. > > Will do.
On second thought, no I won't. It's either already known, or it should
be, making any such submission smell funny.
-Mike
