First off: sorry for my late answer. > I agree the ACPI CA is a nuisance. But in this case, we're making > a mountain out of a molehill. I suspect that if somebody spent the > 15 minutes to make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA > and the generic Intel one and license it appropriately, Len would > happily apply the patch. I hope I got everything right. Here's what I understood so far:
The ACPI Subsystem in the kernel is derived from intel sources. I searched the web for information about that and finally found http://www.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm Is that the right one? So what I would have to do in order to "make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA and the generic Intel one" is to modify those sources aswell, send a patch to Intel and another one back to the lkml. Is that right? Or am I totally wrong? Cheers, Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
