By specifying the properties "mtd-oob-ecc" and "mtd-oob-free", it is
now possible to specify from devicetree where the ECC data is located
inside the OOB region.

Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt |  7 +++++
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c               | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
index 8bb11d809429..118ea92787cb 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
@@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ Optional NAND chip properties:
                     as reliable as possible.
 - nand-rb: shall contain the native Ready/Busy ids.
 
+- nand-oob-ecc: <offset, length> couples of integers, specifying the offset
+                    and length of the ECC data in the OOB region. There can be 
more
+                    than one couple.
+- nand-oob-free: <offset, length> couples of integers, specifying the offset
+                    and length of a free-to-use area in the OOB region. There 
can be
+                    more than one couple.
+
 The ECC strength and ECC step size properties define the correction capability
 of a controller. Together, they say a controller can correct "{strength} bit
 errors per {size} bytes".
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index 72f3a89da513..c905531effb0 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -213,6 +213,43 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops 
nand_ooblayout_lp_hamming_ops = {
        .free = nand_ooblayout_free_lp_hamming,
 };
 
+static int nand_oob_of(struct device_node *np, int section,
+                      struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion, const char *prop)
+{
+       int ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, prop,
+                       section * 2, &oobregion->offset);
+       if (ret == -EOVERFLOW)
+               return -ERANGE; /* We're done */
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
+       ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, prop,
+                       section * 2 + 1, &oobregion->length);
+       if (ret == -EOVERFLOW)
+               return -EINVAL; /* We must have an even number of integers */
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static int nand_ooblayout_ecc_of(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
+                                struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
+{
+       return nand_oob_of(mtd->dev.of_node, section,
+                       oobregion, "nand-oob-ecc");
+}
+
+static int nand_ooblayout_free_of(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
+                                struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
+{
+       return nand_oob_of(mtd->dev.of_node, section,
+                       oobregion, "nand-oob-free");
+}
+
+static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops nand_ooblayout_of_ops = {
+       .ecc = nand_ooblayout_ecc_of,
+       .free = nand_ooblayout_free_of,
+};
+
 static int check_offs_len(struct mtd_info *mtd,
                                        loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 {
@@ -5843,6 +5880,11 @@ static int nand_dt_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
        if (of_property_read_bool(dn, "nand-ecc-maximize"))
                chip->ecc.options |= NAND_ECC_MAXIMIZE;
 
+       if (!chip->mtd.ooblayout &&
+                               of_property_read_bool(dn, "nand-oob-ecc") &&
+                               of_property_read_bool(dn, "nand-oob-free"))
+               chip->mtd.ooblayout = &nand_ooblayout_of_ops;
+
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0

Reply via email to