On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 03:24:34AM +0000, Huaisheng HS1 Ye wrote:
> > From: owner-linux...@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux...@kvack.org] On Behalf 
> > Of Matthew
> > Wilcox
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:10:25AM +0800, Huaisheng Ye wrote:
> > > -#define __GFP_DMA        ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_DMA)
> > > -#define __GFP_HIGHMEM    ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_HIGHMEM)
> > > -#define __GFP_DMA32      ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_DMA32)
> > > +#define __GFP_DMA        ((__force gfp_t)OPT_ZONE_DMA ^ ZONE_NORMAL)
> > > +#define __GFP_HIGHMEM    ((__force gfp_t)ZONE_MOVABLE ^ ZONE_NORMAL)
> > > +#define __GFP_DMA32      ((__force gfp_t)OPT_ZONE_DMA32 ^ ZONE_NORMAL)
> > 
> > No, you've made gfp_zone even more complex than it already is.
> > If you can't use OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM here, then this is a waste of time.
> > 
> Dear Matthew,
> 
> The reason why I don't use OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM for __GFP_HIGHMEM  directly is 
> that, for x86_64 platform there is no CONFIG_HIGHMEM, so OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM 
> shall always be equal to ZONE_NORMAL.

Right.  On 64-bit platforms, if somebody asks for HIGHMEM, they should
get NORMAL pages.

> For gfp_zone it is impossible to distinguish the meaning of lowest 3 bits in 
> flags. How can gfp_zone to understand it comes from OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM or 
> ZONE_NORMAL?
> And the most pained thing is that, if __GFP_HIGHMEM with movable flag 
> enabled, it means that ZONE_MOVABLE shall be returned.
> That is different from ZONE_DMA, ZONE_DMA32 and ZONE_NORMAL.

The point of this exercise is to actually encode the zone number in
the bottom bits of the GFP flags instead of something which has to be
interpreted into a zone number.  When somebody sets __GFP_MOVABLE, they
should also be setting ZONE_MOVABLE:

-#define __GFP_MOVABLE   ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_MOVABLE)  /* ZONE_MOVABLE 
allowed */
+#define __GFP_MOVABLE   ((__force gfp_t)(___GFP_MOVABLE | (ZONE_MOVABLE ^ 
ZONE_NORMAL)))

One thing that does need to change is:

-#define GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE    (GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_MOVABLE)
+#define GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE    (GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE)

otherwise we'll be OR'ing ZONE_MOVABLE and ZONE_HIGHMEM together.

> I was thinking...
> Whether it is possible to use other judgement condition to decide 
> OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM or ZONE_MOVABLE shall be returned from gfp_zone.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Huaisheng Ye
> 
> 
> > >  static inline enum zone_type gfp_zone(gfp_t flags)
> > >  {
> > >   enum zone_type z;
> > > - int bit = (__force int) (flags & GFP_ZONEMASK);
> > > + z = ((__force unsigned int)flags & ___GFP_ZONE_MASK) ^ ZONE_NORMAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (z > OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM)
> > > +         z = OPT_ZONE_HIGHMEM +
> > > +                 !!((__force unsigned int)flags & ___GFP_MOVABLE);
> > >
> > > - z = (GFP_ZONE_TABLE >> (bit * GFP_ZONES_SHIFT)) &
> > > -                                  ((1 << GFP_ZONES_SHIFT) - 1);
> > > - VM_BUG_ON((GFP_ZONE_BAD >> bit) & 1);
> > > + VM_BUG_ON(z > ZONE_MOVABLE);
> > >   return z;
> > >  }
> 

Reply via email to