On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:14 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir7...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Implement stacked fsync().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/overlayfs/file.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/file.c b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>> index a7af56861aa5..419aa3f9967b 100644
>> --- a/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
>> @@ -233,10 +233,30 @@ static ssize_t ovl_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, 
>> struct iov_iter *iter)
>>         return ret;
>>  }
>>
>> +static int ovl_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int 
>> datasync)
>> +{
>> +       struct fd real;
>> +       const struct cred *old_cred;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>
> Don't sync non-upper. same as ovl_dir_fsync()

Ah, that was about EROFS returned by lower fsync, right?

Thanks,
Miklos

Reply via email to