Ingo,

Please pull the softirq/mask-v4 branch that can be found at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
        softirq/mask-v4

HEAD: dc06cbb5e1296938211040bccdacd7a361469116

Changes since v3:

* Rebase against v4.17-rc4
* Fix build error on SH. (new patch "sh: Use nmi_count() on /proc/interrupts 
print out")

--
The softirq mask and its accessors/mutators have many implementations
scattered around many architectures. Most do the same things consisting
in a field in a per-cpu struct (often irq_cpustat_t) accessed through
per-cpu ops. We can provide instead a generic efficient version that
most of them can use. In fact s390 is the only exception because the
field is stored in lowcore.

Thanks,
        Frederic
---

Frederic Weisbecker (11):
      ia64: Convert local_softirq_pending() to per-cpu ops
      sparc: Convert local_softirq_pending() to use per-cpu op
      sh: Use nmi_count() on /proc/interrupts print out
      softirq: Turn default irq_cpustat_t to standard per-cpu
      softirq: Consolidate default local_softirq_pending() implementations
      ia64: Switch to generic local_softirq_pending() implementation
      parisc: Switch to generic local_softirq_pending() implementation
      powerpc: Switch to generic local_softirq_pending() implementation
      sparc: Switch to generic local_softirq_pending() implementation
      x86: Switch to generic local_softirq_pending() implementation
      softirq/s390: Move default mutators of overwritten softirq mask to s390


 arch/ia64/include/asm/hardirq.h     |  2 +-
 arch/parisc/include/asm/hardirq.h   |  8 --------
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h  |  7 -------
 arch/s390/include/asm/hardirq.h     |  2 ++
 arch/sh/kernel/irq.c                |  2 +-
 arch/sparc/include/asm/hardirq_64.h |  5 +++--
 arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h      |  8 --------
 include/linux/interrupt.h           | 13 ++++++++++---
 include/linux/irq_cpustat.h         | 10 +++-------
 kernel/softirq.c                    |  4 ++--
 10 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

Reply via email to