On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:09:55 -0700 "Paul Menage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/8/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:43:46 +0530 > > Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > This patch implements per container statistics infrastructure and re-uses > > > code from the taskstats interface. > > > > boggle. > > > > Symbol: CONTAINERS [=y] > > Selected by: CONTAINER_DEBUG || CPUSETS && SMP || CONTAINER_CPUACCT > > > > Paul, that's just bizarre. How come it was done this way? > > Containers on their own without any subsystems aren't hugely useful. > So the plan was that any container subsystem would "select CONTAINERS" > to cause the container framework to be built. I'm happy to change it > to invert the dependencies if you'd prefer. > - CONTAINER_DEBUG should depend on CONTAINERS - the CPUSETS && SMP is weird and should be deleted, unless I'm missing something - CONTAINERS should depend on CPUSETS - That leaves CONTAINER_CPUACCT. One _could_ `select' CONTAINERS if CONTAINER_CPUACCT but I suspect that'll screw up the above (select does odd things). I think it's reasonable to have a CONTAINERS menu and under that, all the clients of it: CONTAINER_CPUACCT, CONTAINER_MEMORY_CONTROL, etc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
