On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:02:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Looks correct. However I am curious what this "i2c->id" is supposed to > > represent, given that I2C devices do not have any form of ID as PCI or > > USB devices have. No driver uses "MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ...)" > > probably just because it doesn't make sense. So, rather than fixing > > this, shouldn't we simply wipe out struct i2c_device_id? Greg, David? > > If no one is using it, then yes, it should be removed. > > Sorry, I added it a while ago thinking it was going to be used (I had > test patches using it in my tree, but they never worked out in the end.)
OK. Geert, care to submit a new patch removing struct i2c_device_id altogether? Thanks, -- Jean Delvare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
