Hi,

LGTM. Tiny inline comment but TBH might not be worth it.

FWIW: Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schnei...@arm.com>

On 26/04/18 11:30, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Rearrange select_task_rq_fair() a bit to avoid executing some
> conditional statements in few specific code-paths. That gets rid of the
> goto as well.
> 
> This shouldn't result in any functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Rohit Jain <rohit.k.j...@oracle.com>
> 
> ---
> V1->V2:
> - Optimize a bit more and get rid of affine_sd variable (Valentin)
> - Add unlikely while checking for non-NULL sd and add fast/slow path
>   comments (Joel)
> - Add tested-by from Rohit.
> 
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 54dc31e7ab9b..84fc74ddbd4b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6613,7 +6613,7 @@ static int wake_cap(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int 
> prev_cpu)
>  static int
>  select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int 
> wake_flags)
>  {
> -     struct sched_domain *tmp, *affine_sd = NULL, *sd = NULL;
> +     struct sched_domain *tmp, *sd = NULL;
>       int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>       int new_cpu = prev_cpu;
>       int want_affine = 0;
> @@ -6636,7 +6636,10 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int 
> prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
>                */
>               if (want_affine && (tmp->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) &&
>                   cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu, sched_domain_span(tmp))) {
> -                     affine_sd = tmp;
> +                     if (cpu != prev_cpu)
> +                             new_cpu = wake_affine(tmp, p, cpu, prev_cpu, 
> sync);

This cpu != prev_cpu check could be folded into wake_affine() to make this
look a little neater, but we might want to keep things as is to avoid a
function call (it's only ever called once so it might get inlined, but AFAIK
that's not guaranteed).

> +
> +                     sd = NULL; /* Prefer wake_affine over balance flags */
>                       break;
>               }
>  
> @@ -6646,33 +6649,25 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int 
> prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
>                       break;
>       }
>  
> -     if (affine_sd) {
> -             sd = NULL; /* Prefer wake_affine over balance flags */
> -             if (cpu == prev_cpu)
> -                     goto pick_cpu;
> -
> -             new_cpu = wake_affine(affine_sd, p, cpu, prev_cpu, sync);
> -     }
> +     if (unlikely(sd)) {
> +             /* Slow path */
>  
> -     if (sd && !(sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_FORK)) {
>               /*
>                * We're going to need the task's util for capacity_spare_wake
>                * in find_idlest_group. Sync it up to prev_cpu's
>                * last_update_time.
>                */
> -             sync_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
> -     }
> -
> -     if (!sd) {
> -pick_cpu:
> -             if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) { /* XXX always ? */
> -                     new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu);
> +             if (!(sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_FORK))
> +                     sync_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
>  
> -                     if (want_affine)
> -                             current->recent_used_cpu = cpu;
> -             }
> -     } else {
>               new_cpu = find_idlest_cpu(sd, p, cpu, prev_cpu, sd_flag);
> +     } else if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) { /* XXX always ? */
> +             /* Fast path */
> +
> +             new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu);
> +
> +             if (want_affine)
> +                     current->recent_used_cpu = cpu;
>       }
>       rcu_read_unlock();
>  
> 

Reply via email to