On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote: > accept2(int fd, ...)
I don't see any reason to not have it inherit the non-sequential characteristics of "fd". > pipe2(int *fds, int oflags); I think pipe+sys_nonseqfd should be OK for those. > eventfd2(int count, int oflags); > signalfd2(int ufd, sigset_t __user *user_mask, size_t sizemask, int oflags); > timerfd2(int ufd, int clockid, int flags,const struct itimerspec __user > *utmr, int oflags) ... Those I think we're still in time to change the interface. No? Even if not, those are not perf-critical, so I think that syscall+sys_nonseqfd is still fine. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
