On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:10:38 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > > That thread using cond_resched_task_rcu_qs() seems like a _lot_ better > than having cond_resched() semantics change depending on random > !scheduler config parameters. Yeah, I agree. Not sure why Paul didn't push it. Maybe because I never replied to that final email and he forgot? Paul? -- Steve
