On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:43:42AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> What Ben was talking about was stealing a synchronous SEGV from a task
> without stopping it, and as Ben says that makes no sense.
> Intercepting a signal and stopping the task is reasonable, and that is
> what ptrace does, and I assume also UML.
It is, but I can also see UML stealing the SEGV from the child. The
UML skas does this - a ptrace extension, PTRACE_FAULTINFO, is used to
extract page fault information from the child, and other pieces of the
patch are used to fix the fault without the child continuing until
it's fixed. So, in this case, the child never sees the SEGV.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
