On 2018-04-13 16:47, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > On 04/12/2018 05:31 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2018-04-12 17:35, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >>> True, how about "current-sense-from-voltage" ? >> >> Doesn't cover "voltage-divider" (and we don't need separate drivers >> doing the exact same calculations, that's a maintenance nightmare). > > The driver name doesn't have to cover every use, just more than the > other name.
I also find current-sense-from-voltage unwieldy. It's simply too long. Cheers, Peter
