On 09/03/2018 22:09, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> This binding is intended to represent the interconnect hardware present
> in some of the modern SoCs. Currently it consists only of a binding for
> the interconnect hardware devices (provider).
>
> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.dja...@linaro.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt | 47
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..70612bb201e4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> +Interconnect Provider Device Tree Bindings
> +=========================================
> +
> +The purpose of this document is to define a common set of generic
> interconnect
> +providers/consumers properties.
> +
> +
> += interconnect providers =
> +
> +The interconnect provider binding is intended to represent the interconnect
> +controllers in the system. Each provider registers a set of interconnect
> +nodes, which expose the interconnect related capabilities of the interconnect
> +to consumer drivers. These capabilities can be throughput, latency, priority
> +etc. The consumer drivers set constraints on interconnect path (or endpoints)
> +depending on the usecase. Interconnect providers can also be interconnect
> +consumers, such as in the case where two network-on-chip fabrics interface
> +directly
Hi,
Can't we specify the number of cells for the phandle ? It should be aligned
with other consumer/provider bindings.
Neil
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : contains the interconnect provider vendor specific compatible
> + string
> +- reg : register space of the interconnect controller hardware
> +
> +Examples:
> +
> + snoc: snoc@580000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-snoc";
> + reg = <0x580000 0x14000>;
> + clock-names = "bus_clk", "bus_a_clk";
> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK>, <&rpmcc
> RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK>;
> + status = "okay";
> + };
> + bimc: bimc@400000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-bimc";
> + reg = <0x400000 0x62000>;
> + clock-names = "bus_clk", "bus_a_clk";
> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK>, <&rpmcc
> RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK>;
> + status = "okay";
> + };
> + pnoc: pnoc@500000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-pnoc";
> + reg = <0x500000 0x11000>;
> + clock-names = "bus_clk", "bus_a_clk";
> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_PCNOC_CLK>, <&rpmcc
> RPM_SMD_PCNOC_A_CLK>;
> + status = "okay";
> + };
> +
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
