On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 22:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > I'd say go with the cleanups. The code I've seen is going to be quite > unmaintainable by any kernel developer. > > Any fixes which come from upstream can be trivially applied by taking the > diffs against the version of upstream we started with and manually applying > them to our version. If the diffs are too large and complex for that then > a) we shouldn't be merging the code in its current state anyway and b) with > the code as-is we couldn't effectively review or changelog those diffs, so > we shouldn't apply them. > > So just fork it and freeze it.
Ok, thanks for the decision. Since I don't have too much faith in what Nitin has done with it, I'll produce a version myself. In theory we should end up with identical code so will be a sanity check of Nitin's code if nothing else. Cheers, Richard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
