Quoting Paul Menage ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On 6/4/07, Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Yup - early in the life of cpusets, a created cpuset inherited the cpus > >and mems of its parent. But that broke the exclusive property big > >time. You will recall that a cpu_exclusive or mem_exclusive cpuset > >cannot overlap the cpus or memory, respectively, of any of its sibling > >cpusets. > > > > Maybe we could make it a per-cpuset option whether children should > inherit mems/cpus or not?
The values can be changed after the cpuset is populated, right? So really these are just defaults? Would it then make sense to just default to (parent_set - sibling_exclusive_set) for a new sibling's value? An option is fine with me, but without such an option at all, cpusets could not be applied to namespaces... thanks, -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
