> > CONFIG_PCI=n > > CONFIG_ATA=m > > > > This seems to be a valid configuration since libata can drive non-PCI > > devices too?
Yep. > It really makes no sense to allow this on Sparc, there are no > non-PCI Sparc ATA controllers. There are PCMCIA controllers and PCI/PCMCIA/Cardbus adapters for the Sparc platform I thought ? > diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig > index b4a8d60..7d893a6 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ menuconfig ATA > depends on BLOCK > depends on !(M32R || M68K) || BROKEN > depends on !SUN4 || BROKEN > + depends on !(SPARC64 && !PCI) NAK - this is the wrong approach. PCI=n ATA=m should compile. Sparc is not the only problem case. The DMA handling bits of libata are fairly nicely split out but they are stuck in the same file and unconditionally compiled in. I'll have a poke at this when I get a bit of time if Jeff doesn't. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
