On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 11:51:18AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > If it's being relied on, or if there's actually something firmly planned, > which we could track, then I'd have no problem with reverting this change > and waiting one more kernel cycle or so.
I don't see why the clang people can't go back to using out of tree patches to make their compile 'work' until they've caught up with 7-year old tech. Also, I'd really like to know if there are any plans to support asm-cc-output, otherwise we'll have this same old drama all over again in a few years :/
