On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Alexander, in one point at least you are wrong. That one point is -- I did
> _not_ suggest any optimizations (especially microoptimizations). I was
> merely trying to see exactly _why_ d_move() needs a BKL since it takes
> dcache_lock which already protects the lists which d_move manipulats.
->d_parent
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
