On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 22:12:24 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> synchronize_rcu() lacks a might_sleep() check which would have caught that > issue way earlier because it would trigger with the minimal debug options > enabled. > > Add a might_sleep() check to catch such cases. I'm not against the patch, but really? I would think that synchronize_rcu() would pretty much always schedule, and scheduling from atomic would have triggered with minimal debug options enabled. -- Steve
