> -----Original Message----- > From: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de> > Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 7:00 AM > To: Ghannam, Yazen <yazen.ghan...@amd.com> > Cc: Tony Luck <tony.l...@intel.com>; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; x...@kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Decode IA32/X64 CPER > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 08:58:15PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote: > > 1) We keep this set mostly as-is. This would be our fallback if we don't > > have > > anything better. > > Yes, sounds good. We try to decode it as MCE and if we cannot, we dump > the raw CPER record. > > > 2) I add the MCA decoding to this set. I was thinking to do this in a > > separate > > set but maybe it's better to do it all together. > > I'm fine if you do it separately, as long as you do it so that we have > user-friendly decoding in the end. >
I wanted to add the MCA decoding to this set but I got caught up with something else and haven't had time to do it. Is it alright if I go ahead and just send the v3 of this set without the MCA decoding? I was hoping this could be accepted in the next merge window. And if that's still possible I'd like to have some CPER decoding sooner rather than nothing. Thanks, Yazen
