On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:50:36 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> > Given that, how about a patch to Documentation/Changes to reflect the new > > reality? It's not in RST yet, so you should be able to go there without > > ill effect :) > > > That thing says: > > GCC > --- > > The gcc version requirements may vary depending on the type of CPU in your > computer. jon > > Which is still entirely accurate. And afaik the 3.2 minimum listed there > still works for !x86. Well, other recent discussions established that nothing earlier than 4.1 has been observed to work anywhere for some time. I guess what we really need is a little table of architecture-specific minimum GCC versions so that our users actually know what's required. I'll see if I can find a moment to pull that together at some point. jon
