On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 16:26 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Thu 2018-03-15 15:09:03, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 15:09 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > We already prevent crash when dereferencing some obviously broken > > > pointers. But the handling is not consistent. Sometimes we print > > > "(null)" > > > only for pure NULL pointer, sometimes for pointers in the first > > > page and > > > > > > > sometimes also for pointers in the last page (error codes). > > > > I still think that printing a hex value of the error code is much > > better > > than some odd "(efault)". > > Do you mean (err:0e)? Google gives rather confusing answers for this.
More like "(0xHHHH)" (we have already more than 512 error code numbers. > I am not super excited about (efault). But it seems to be less > cryptic and the style is more similar to (null). > > Best Regards, > Petr -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
