On Wednesday 30 May 2007 13:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 12:58:11 -0700
> Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >> +int update_console_cmdline(char *name, int idx, char *name_new, int
> > >> idx_new, char *options)
> > >> +{
> > >> + struct console_cmdline *c;
> > >> + int i;
> > >> +
> > >> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_CMDLINECONSOLES &&
> > >> console_cmdline[i].name[0]; i++)
> > >> + if (strcmp(console_cmdline[i].name, name) == 0 &&
> > >> + console_cmdline[i].index == idx) {
> > >> + c = &console_cmdline[i];
> > >> + memcpy(c->name, name_new,
> > >> sizeof(c->name));
> > >> + c->name[sizeof(c->name) - 1] = 0;
> > >> + c->options = options;
> > >> + c->index = idx_new;
> > >> + return i;
> > >> + }
> > >> + /* not found */
> > >> + return -1;
> > >> +}
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this be __init?
> > >
> > > serial8250_find_port_for_earlycon() had its __init removed. Why?
> > with __init, the compiler will cry about .init.text and .text missection.
>
> But was this the correct fix for that? afaict the only caller of
> this function is __init anyway.
>
You are right.
serial8250_find_port_for_earlycon and
update_console_cmdline in kernel/printk.c
could be __init
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
