On Wed, 30 May 2007 06:34:03 -0500 Robin Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That breaks git-bisect.  Just introducing new text, but not actually using
> it makes it appear to somebody using git-bisect to identify the source of
> a problem as though all the changes came in at the same time.  Bad idea.

But the patch set as it is includes references to files that do not exist
and so breaks the build.

Ideally, you would introduce references to files as the files are
introduced. I was suggesting a simpler reordering of the patches.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpS96F81Z4uM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to