Guennadi,
I have watched this and even if UDMA is not supported cleanly by the
drive, the classic ATA-2 Multi-wrod DMA should be. There was a time in
the past where WDC had some problems, but they have fixed most if not all
with "modern" drives. I will be at WDC in two weeks, and I can raise the
issues with them. Please spell them out completely.
Regards,
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Well, yes, I thought they could not have known:-)) I'm absolutely stuck. If disk is
>fine, chipset is fine and supported by the kernel, then BIOS doesn't (or shouldn't)
>make a difference... Then WHAT ON THE EARTH??? Mike, have you been able to recall
>what BIOS option turned DMA on? Shall I write to Andre Hedrick directly? Or is there
>a mailing-list smth. like linux-ide?
>
> > Now, the question is, can we trust a hard drive manufacturer
> > support tech to know what they're talking about, with evidence to
> > the contrary? :)
>
> Thanks
> Guennadi
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
