On Tue, 29 May 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:07:01 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > kernel/sysctl.c:
> > >
> > > {
> > > .ctl_name = FS_STATINODE,
> > > .procname = "inode-state",
> > > .data = &inodes_stat,
> > > .maxlen = 7*sizeof(int), <-----
> > > .mode = 0444,
> > > .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
> > > },
> > >
> > > akpm:/home/akpm> cat /proc/sys/fs/inode-state
> > > 608039 178454 0 0 0 0 0
> > >
> > > So it _is_ used: to present those five zeroes. I think this is
> > > for back-compatibility with some cretaceous-era kernel.
> >
> > ah, gotcha. well, i'll leave this up to someone else to do
> > anything with if they are so inclined.
>
> There's little to be done, except possibly put a /* comment */ on
> the struct's dummy line so that we don't go thru this again in N
> years.
so, just to clarify, what *is* the value of those trailing five
zeroes? andrew suggests it's to be backward-compatible with an old
kernel, which doesn't make much sense to me. it would make more sense
to say that that's backward-compatible with some old userspace app
that always wants to see seven values and just ignores the last five.
in any event, from Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt:
"inode-state contains two actual numbers and five dummy values. The
numbers are nr_inodes and nr_free_inodes (in order of appearance)."
if even the documentation calls them dummy values, do they really have
any residual value at this point? and on that note, i'll stop harping
on this and move on.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
