On 3/6/2018 11:23 PM, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> This patch adds dynamic security hooks. These hooks are designed to allow
> for safe runtime loading.
>
> These hooks are only run after all built-in, and major LSMs are run.
> The LSMs enabled by this feature must be minor LSMs, but they can poke
> at the security blobs, as the blobs should be initialized by the time
> their callback happens.
>
> There should be little runtime performance overhead for this feature,
> as it's protected behind static_keys, which are disabled by default,
> and are only enabled per-hook at runtime, when a module is loaded.
>
> Currently, the hook heads are separated for dynamic hooks, because
> it is not read-only like the hooks which are loaded at runtime.
>
> Some hooks are blacklisted, and attempting to load an LSM with any
> of them in use will fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sar...@sargun.me>
> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h |  26 +++++-
>  security/Kconfig          |   9 +++
>  security/inode.c          |  13 ++-
>  security/security.c       | 198 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index d28c7f5b01c1..4e6351957dff 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  #include <linux/security.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/rculist.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  
>  /**
>   * union security_list_options - Linux Security Module hook function list
> @@ -1968,6 +1969,9 @@ struct security_hook_list {
>       enum lsm_hook                   head_idx;
>       union security_list_options     hook;
>       char                            *lsm;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +     struct module                   *owner;
> +#endif
>  } __randomize_layout;
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1976,11 +1980,29 @@ struct security_hook_list {
>   * care of the common case and reduces the amount of
>   * text involved.
>   */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +#define LSM_HOOK_INIT(HEAD, HOOK)            \
> +     {                                       \
> +             .head_idx = HOOK_IDX(HEAD),     \
> +             .hook = { .HEAD = HOOK },       \
> +             .owner = THIS_MODULE,           \
> +     }
> +
> +#else
>  #define LSM_HOOK_INIT(HEAD, HOOK) \
>       { .head_idx = HOOK_IDX(HEAD), .hook = { .HEAD = HOOK } }
> +#endif
>  
> -extern char *lsm_names;
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +extern int security_add_dynamic_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks,
> +                                   int count, char *lsm);
> +#else
> +static inline int security_add_dynamic_hooks(struct security_hook_list 
> *hooks,
> +                                          int count, char *lsm)
> +{
> +     return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +#endif
>  extern void security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
>                               char *lsm);
>  
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
> index c4302067a3ad..481b93b0d4d9 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/Kconfig
> @@ -36,6 +36,15 @@ config SECURITY_WRITABLE_HOOKS
>       bool
>       default n
>  
> +config SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +     bool "Runtime loadable (minor) LSMs via LKMs"
> +     depends on SECURITY && SRCU
> +     help
> +       This enables LSMs which live in LKMs, and supports loading, and
> +       unloading them safely at runtime. These LSMs must be minor LSMs.
> +       They cannot circumvent the built-in LSMs.
> +       If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
> +
>  config SECURITYFS
>       bool "Enable the securityfs filesystem"
>       help
> diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c
> index 8dd9ca8848e4..89be07b044a5 100644
> --- a/security/inode.c
> +++ b/security/inode.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
>  #include <linux/security.h>
>  #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
>  #include <linux/magic.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +
> +extern char *lsm_names;
> +extern struct mutex lsm_lock;
>  
>  static struct vfsmount *mount;
>  static int mount_count;
> @@ -312,8 +316,13 @@ static struct dentry *lsm_dentry;
>  static ssize_t lsm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count,
>                       loff_t *ppos)
>  {
> -     return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, lsm_names,
> -             strlen(lsm_names));
> +     ssize_t ret;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&lsm_lock);
> +     ret = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, lsm_names,
> +                                   strlen(lsm_names));
> +     mutex_unlock(&lsm_lock);
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct file_operations lsm_ops = {
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index b9fb297b824e..492d44dd0549 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>  #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <net/flow.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>  
>  #define MAX_LSM_EVM_XATTR    2
>  
> @@ -36,10 +37,18 @@
>  #define SECURITY_NAME_MAX    10

I expect that this limit will be too small for loadable modules.

>  static struct list_head security_hook_heads[__MAX_LSM_HOOK] 
> __lsm_ro_after_init;
> -static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(lsm_notifier_chain);
> -
>  #define HOOK_HEAD(NAME)      (&security_hook_heads[HOOK_IDX(NAME)])
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +static struct list_head dynamic_security_hook_heads[__MAX_LSM_HOOK];
> +static struct srcu_struct dynamic_hook_srcus[__MAX_LSM_HOOK];
> +#define DYNAMIC_HOOK_HEAD(NAME)      
> (&dynamic_security_hook_heads[HOOK_IDX(NAME)])
> +#define DYNAMIC_HOOK_SRCU(NAME)      (&dynamic_hook_srcus[HOOK_IDX(NAME)])
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_ARRAY_FALSE(dynamic_hook_keys, __MAX_LSM_HOOK);
> +#endif
> +static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(lsm_notifier_chain);
> +
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(lsm_lock);
>  char *lsm_names;
>  /* Boot-time LSM user choice */
>  static __initdata char chosen_lsm[SECURITY_NAME_MAX + 1] =
> @@ -55,6 +64,23 @@ static void __init do_security_initcalls(void)
>       }
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +static void security_init_dynamic_hooks(void)
> +{
> +     int i, err;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dynamic_security_hook_heads); i++) {
> +             INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dynamic_security_hook_heads[i]);
> +             err = init_srcu_struct(&dynamic_hook_srcus[i]);
> +             if (err)
> +                     panic("%s: Could not initialize SRCU - %d\n",
> +                           __func__, err);
> +     }
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void security_init_dynamic_hooks(void) {};
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
>   * security_init - initializes the security framework
>   *
> @@ -66,6 +92,7 @@ int __init security_init(void)
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(security_hook_heads); i++)
>               INIT_LIST_HEAD(&security_hook_heads[i]);
> +     security_init_dynamic_hooks();
>       pr_info("Security Framework initialized\n");
>  
>       /*
> @@ -172,6 +199,64 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list 
> *hooks, int count,
>               panic("%s - Cannot get early memory.\n", __func__);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +static int hook_allowed(enum lsm_hook hook_idx)
> +{
> +     switch (hook_idx) {
> +     case HOOK_IDX(inode_getsecurity):
> +     case HOOK_IDX(inode_setsecurity):
> +     case HOOK_IDX(xfrm_state_pol_flow_match):
> +             return -EPERM;
> +     default:
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +}

Where did this list come from? Why doesn't it include
secid_to_secctx? Why does it include xfrm_stat_pol_flow_match?

> +/**
> + * security_add_dynamic_hooks:
> + *   Register a dynamically loadable module's security hooks.
> + *
> + * @hooks: the hooks to add
> + * @count: the number of hooks to add
> + * @lsm: the name of the security module
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 if successful
> + * else errno, and no hooks will be installed
> + */
> +int security_add_dynamic_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
> +                             char *lsm)
> +{
> +     enum lsm_hook hook_idx;
> +     int ret = 0, i;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +             ret = hook_allowed(hooks[i].head_idx);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +     }
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&lsm_lock);
> +     ret = lsm_append(lsm, &lsm_names);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto out;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +             WARN_ON(!try_module_get(hooks[i].owner));
> +             hooks[i].lsm = lsm;
> +             hook_idx = hooks[i].head_idx;
> +             list_add_tail_rcu(&hooks[i].list,
> +                               &dynamic_security_hook_heads[hook_idx]);
> +             static_branch_enable(&dynamic_hook_keys[hook_idx]);
> +     }
> +
> +out:
> +     mutex_unlock(&lsm_lock);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(security_add_dynamic_hooks);
> +#endif
> +
>  int call_lsm_notifier(enum lsm_event event, void *data)
>  {
>       return atomic_notifier_call_chain(&lsm_notifier_chain, event, data);
> @@ -200,14 +285,69 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_lsm_notifier);
>   *   This is a hook that returns a value.
>   */
>  
> -#define call_void_hook(FUNC, ...)                            \
> +#define call_void_hook_builtin(FUNC, ...) do {                       \
> +     struct security_hook_list *P;                           \
> +     list_for_each_entry(P, HOOK_HEAD(FUNC), list)           \
> +             P->hook.FUNC(__VA_ARGS__);                      \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +#define IS_DYNAMIC_HOOK_ENABLED(FUNC)                                \
> +     (static_branch_unlikely(&dynamic_hook_keys[HOOK_IDX(FUNC)]))
> +
> +#define call_void_hook_dynamic(FUNC, ...) ({                 \
> +     struct security_hook_list *P;                           \
> +     int idx;                                                \
> +                                                             \
> +     idx = srcu_read_lock(DYNAMIC_HOOK_SRCU(FUNC));          \
> +     list_for_each_entry_rcu(P,                              \
> +                             DYNAMIC_HOOK_HEAD(FUNC),        \
> +                             list) {                         \
> +             P->hook.FUNC(__VA_ARGS__);                      \
> +     }                                                       \
> +     srcu_read_unlock(DYNAMIC_HOOK_SRCU(FUNC), idx);         \

There has got to be a better way to do this than setting a lock
for every hook call.

> +})
> +
> +#define call_void_hook(FUNC, ...)    \
> +     do {                            \
> +             call_void_hook_builtin(FUNC, __VA_ARGS__);      \
> +             if (!IS_DYNAMIC_HOOK_ENABLED(FUNC))             \
> +                     break;                                  \

Why not let the list macros do their job?

> +             call_void_hook_dynamic(FUNC, __VA_ARGS__);      \
> +     } while (0)
> +
> +#define call_int_hook(FUNC, IRC, ...) ({                     \
> +     bool continue_iteration = true;                         \
> +     int RC = IRC, idx;                                      \
>       do {                                                    \
>               struct security_hook_list *P;                   \
>                                                               \
> -             list_for_each_entry(P, HOOK_HEAD(FUNC), list)   \
> -                     P->hook.FUNC(__VA_ARGS__);              \
> -     } while (0)
> +             list_for_each_entry(P, HOOK_HEAD(FUNC), list) { \
> +                     RC = P->hook.FUNC(__VA_ARGS__);         \
> +                     if (RC != 0) {                          \
> +                             continue_iteration = false;     \
> +                             break;                          \
> +                     }                                       \
> +             }                                               \
> +             if (!IS_DYNAMIC_HOOK_ENABLED(FUNC))             \
> +                     break;                                  \
> +             if (!continue_iteration)                        \
> +                     break;                                  \
> +             idx = srcu_read_lock(DYNAMIC_HOOK_SRCU(FUNC));  \
> +             list_for_each_entry_rcu(P,                      \
> +                                     DYNAMIC_HOOK_HEAD(FUNC), \
> +                                     list) {                 \
> +                     RC = P->hook.FUNC(__VA_ARGS__);         \
> +                     if (RC != 0)                            \
> +                             break;                          \
> +             }                                               \
> +             srcu_read_unlock(DYNAMIC_HOOK_SRCU(FUNC), idx); \
> +     } while (0);                                            \
> +     RC;                                                     \
> +})
>  
> +#else
> +#define call_void_hook       call_void_hook_builtin

I think this is hideous.

>  #define call_int_hook(FUNC, IRC, ...) ({                     \
>       int RC = IRC;                                           \
>       do {                                                    \
> @@ -221,6 +361,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_lsm_notifier);
>       } while (0);                                            \
>       RC;                                                     \
>  })
> +#endif
>  
>  /* Security operations */
>  
> @@ -312,6 +453,9 @@ int security_vm_enough_memory_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, 
> long pages)
>       struct security_hook_list *hp;
>       int cap_sys_admin = 1;
>       int rc;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +     int idx;
> +#endif
>  
>       /*
>        * The module will respond with a positive value if
> @@ -324,9 +468,25 @@ int security_vm_enough_memory_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, 
> long pages)
>               rc = hp->hook.vm_enough_memory(mm, pages);
>               if (rc <= 0) {
>                       cap_sys_admin = 0;
> -                     break;
> +                     goto out;
>               }
>       }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +     if (!IS_DYNAMIC_HOOK_ENABLED(vm_enough_memory))
> +             goto out;
> +     idx = srcu_read_lock(DYNAMIC_HOOK_SRCU(vm_enough_memory));
> +     list_for_each_entry_rcu(hp, DYNAMIC_HOOK_HEAD(vm_enough_memory),
> +                             list) {
> +             rc = hp->hook.vm_enough_memory(mm, pages);
> +             if (rc <= 0) {
> +                     cap_sys_admin = 0;
> +                     goto out;
> +             }
> +     }
> +     srcu_read_unlock(DYNAMIC_HOOK_SRCU(vm_enough_memory), idx);
> +#endif
> +out:
>       return __vm_enough_memory(mm, pages, cap_sys_admin);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1128,15 +1288,36 @@ int security_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long 
> arg2, unsigned long arg3,
>       int thisrc;
>       int rc = -ENOSYS;
>       struct security_hook_list *hp;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +     int idx;
> +#endif
>  
>       list_for_each_entry(hp, HOOK_HEAD(task_prctl), list) {
>               thisrc = hp->hook.task_prctl(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
>               if (thisrc != -ENOSYS) {
>                       rc = thisrc;
>                       if (thisrc != 0)
> -                             break;
> +                             goto out;
>               }
>       }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DYNAMIC_HOOKS
> +     if (!IS_DYNAMIC_HOOK_ENABLED(task_prctl))
> +             goto out;
> +     idx = srcu_read_lock(DYNAMIC_HOOK_SRCU(task_prctl));
> +     list_for_each_entry_rcu(hp, DYNAMIC_HOOK_HEAD(task_prctl),
> +                             list) {
> +             thisrc = hp->hook.task_prctl(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5);
> +             if (thisrc != -ENOSYS) {
> +                     rc = thisrc;
> +                     if (thisrc != 0)
> +                             goto out_unlock;
> +             }
> +     }
> +out_unlock:
> +     srcu_read_unlock(DYNAMIC_HOOK_SRCU(task_prctl), idx);
> +#endif
> +out:
>       return rc;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1636,6 +1817,7 @@ int security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct 
> xfrm_state *x,
>               rc = hp->hook.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, xp, fl);
>               break;
>       }
> +
>       return rc;
>  }
>  

Reply via email to