On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:10:31PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is tester code used for testing.
> (developed by Daniel Hazelton -- modified slightly to now use 'take 6'
> version for 'TinyLZO')
>
> Cheers,
> Nitin
>
> On 5/28/07, Nitin Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (Using tester program from Daniel)
>>
>> Following compares this kernel port ('take 6') vs original miniLZO code:
>>
>> 'TinyLZO' refers to this kernel port.
>>
>> 10000 run averages:
>> 'Tiny LZO':
>> Combined: 61.2223 usec
>> Compression: 41.8412 usec
>> Decompression: 19.3811 usec
>> 'miniLZO':
>> Combined: 66.0444 usec
>> Compression: 46.6323 usec
>> Decompression: 19.4121 usec
>>
>> Result:
>> Overall: TinyLZO is 7.3% faster
>> Compressor: TinyLZO is 10.2% faster
>> Decompressor: TinyLZO is 0.15% faster
So your the compressor of your version runs 10.2% faster than the
original version.
That's a huge difference.
Why exactly is it that much faster?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
