Hi, Attached is tester code used for testing. (developed by Daniel Hazelton -- modified slightly to now use 'take 6' version for 'TinyLZO')
Cheers, Nitin On 5/28/07, Nitin Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Using tester program from Daniel)
Following compares this kernel port ('take 6') vs original miniLZO code:
'TinyLZO' refers to this kernel port.
10000 run averages:
'Tiny LZO':
Combined: 61.2223 usec
Compression: 41.8412 usec
Decompression: 19.3811 usec
'miniLZO':
Combined: 66.0444 usec
Compression: 46.6323 usec
Decompression: 19.4121 usec
Result:
Overall: TinyLZO is 7.3% faster
Compressor: TinyLZO is 10.2% faster
Decompressor: TinyLZO is 0.15% faster
lzo1x-test-4.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
