> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 14:57
> To: Winkler, Tomas <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca>; Usyskin, Alexander
> <alexander.usys...@intel.com>; linux-integr...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> security-mod...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] tpm: add longer timeouts for creation
> commands.
>
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 02:12:03PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > TPM2_CC_Create(0x153) and TPM2_CC_CreatePrimary (0x131) involve
> > generation of crypto keys which can be a computationally intensive task.
> > The timeout is set to 3min.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.wink...@intel.com>
>
> Where is the cover letter? Please send separate patches if they are unrelated
> *or* add a cover letter that describes what they do as a whole.
>
Why you need cover letter? What are u missing in the patch description
> I will not review the next version if it does not have cover letter describing
> the high level change and containing the change log.
Don't follow.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 4 ++++
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 8 +++++---
> > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > index 85bdfa8c3348..c0aa9d11ec7a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > @@ -699,6 +699,10 @@ int tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_MEDIUM);
> > chip->duration[TPM_LONG] =
> > msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_LONG);
> > + chip->duration[TPM_LONG_LONG] =
> > + msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_LONG_LONG);
> > + chip->duration[TPM_UNDEFINED] =
> > + msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_DEFAULT);
> >
> > chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HAVE_TIMEOUTS;
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h index
> > f895fba4e20d..192ba68b39c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > @@ -67,7 +67,9 @@ enum tpm_duration {
> > TPM_SHORT = 0,
> > TPM_MEDIUM = 1,
> > TPM_LONG = 2,
> > - TPM_UNDEFINED,
> > + TPM_LONG_LONG = 3,
> > + TPM_UNDEFINED = 4,
> > + TPM_DURATION_MAX,
>
> This is starting to rotten to become unmaintainable.
> Here is what I suggest to move forward:
I fixed that in next patch, but this also moves the code to new spec, so I
didn't want to make too much noise in this one.
> * Have essentially two duration types:
> 1. Default
> 2. Long
> 'default' is the old long duration i.e. two seconds. 'long' is a
>
> We should probably have two durations:
>
> enum tpm_duration {
> TPM_DURATION_DEFAULT = 2000,
> TPM_DURATION_LONG = 300000,
> };
>
How is this aligned with the spec PTP spec?
> These would be both for TPM 1.2 and TPM 2.0. Instead of having table for
> every ordinal there should be a small tables describing commands that
> require long timeout.
Yeah I didn't cover the 1.2.
>
> > - duration = 2 * 60 * HZ;
> > + duration = msecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_DEFAULT);
>
> NAK for this change.
You should explain your NAKs, .... in general, doesn't look good.
Thanks
Tomas
