On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 07:44:36AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > - return root->gfp_mask & __GFP_BITS_MASK; > > + return root->gfp_mask & ((__GFP_BITS_MASK >> 4) << 4); > > Maybe phrase this in terms of a constant like GFP_ZONEMASK here? Would > this be more appropriate?
Yeah, that's a better idea. This is only interim; once all radix tree users are converted to the xarray, we stop storing GFP flags here. So I hadn't put much thought into it, but I'll change it.
