On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 04:39:12PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Commit ae91aa0adb14(rcu: Remove debugfs tracing) removed the RCU debugfs
> tracing code, and left deprecated code.
> 
> Because exp_workdone{0,1,2,3} won't be used anymore since the commit,
> it's better to remove code to do with those variables. Remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com>

Good catch, queued for testing and review, thank you!

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.h     |  4 ----
>  kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 13 +++++--------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> index 9dd0ea7..cfeb351 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> @@ -234,10 +234,6 @@ struct rcu_data {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ
>       struct rcu_head oom_head;
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ */
> -     atomic_long_t exp_workdone0;    /* # done by workqueue. */
> -     atomic_long_t exp_workdone1;    /* # done by others #1. */
> -     atomic_long_t exp_workdone2;    /* # done by others #2. */
> -     atomic_long_t exp_workdone3;    /* # done by others #3. */
>       int exp_dynticks_snap;          /* Double-check need for IPI. */
> 
>       /* 6) Callback offloading. */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index 73e1d3d..f8e4571 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -248,14 +248,12 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rdp(struct rcu_state *rsp, 
> struct rcu_data *rdp,
>  }
> 
>  /* Common code for synchronize_{rcu,sched}_expedited() work-done checking. */
> -static bool sync_exp_work_done(struct rcu_state *rsp, atomic_long_t *stat,
> -                            unsigned long s)
> +static bool sync_exp_work_done(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long s)
>  {
>       if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp, s)) {
>               trace_rcu_exp_grace_period(rsp->name, s, TPS("done"));
>               /* Ensure test happens before caller kfree(). */
>               smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
> -             atomic_long_inc(stat);
>               return true;
>       }
>       return false;
> @@ -289,7 +287,7 @@ static bool exp_funnel_lock(struct rcu_state *rsp, 
> unsigned long s)
>        * promoting locality and is not strictly needed for correctness.
>        */
>       for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
> -             if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, &rdp->exp_workdone1, s))
> +             if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, s))
>                       return true;
> 
>               /* Work not done, either wait here or go up. */
> @@ -302,8 +300,7 @@ static bool exp_funnel_lock(struct rcu_state *rsp, 
> unsigned long s)
>                                                 rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
>                                                 TPS("wait"));
>                       wait_event(rnp->exp_wq[rcu_seq_ctr(s) & 0x3],
> -                                sync_exp_work_done(rsp,
> -                                                   &rdp->exp_workdone2, s));
> +                                sync_exp_work_done(rsp, s));
>                       return true;
>               }
>               rnp->exp_seq_rq = s; /* Followers can wait on us. */
> @@ -313,7 +310,7 @@ static bool exp_funnel_lock(struct rcu_state *rsp, 
> unsigned long s)
>       }
>       mutex_lock(&rsp->exp_mutex);
>  fastpath:
> -     if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, &rdp->exp_workdone3, s)) {
> +     if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, s)) {
>               mutex_unlock(&rsp->exp_mutex);
>               return true;
>       }
> @@ -661,7 +658,7 @@ static void _synchronize_rcu_expedited(struct rcu_state 
> *rsp,
>       rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id());
>       rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
>       wait_event(rnp->exp_wq[rcu_seq_ctr(s) & 0x3],
> -                sync_exp_work_done(rsp, &rdp->exp_workdone0, s));
> +                sync_exp_work_done(rsp, s));
>       smp_mb(); /* Workqueue actions happen before return. */
> 
>       /* Let the next expedited grace period start. */
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Reply via email to