On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:44:02PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> Anyway. I've tested the following patch on a dual-core x86. No obvious 
> issues yet, but I'll try to put it through a few hundred cycles.

This /mostly/ works - I've had my test machine cycling through a suspend 
cycle every 10 seconds for the past hour without any difficulties 
providing I unload USB first. If USB is loaded, the suspend occasionally 
fails with one of the devices returning -EBUSY and causing it to be 
aborted. I haven't looked into this in any detail yet, but it's 
presumably sufficiently generic code that it's potentially biting people 
on PPC anyway.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to