On Thursday 24 May 2007 21:56, Uwe Bugla wrote: > Please note: > > 1. IRQ 255 looks very idiotic, doesn't it? It does not exist at all, does it? > > Questions: > > 1. What is the technical need / progress of module ssb please? > > 2. If Andrew Morton's guidelines clearly say: "Do test your patches on three > different machines" and this guideline seems to be strictly ignored by some > sparetime hackers: > > What is the master plan then to avoid the fact that such a crap is being sent > in to Andrew? > > Yours sincerely > > Uwe > > P. S.: There is an important saying going like this: > > Too many cooks do mess up the pap. > > Regarding the patch in mm-tree I can see SIX (!) Copyright owners. > The last one of them (i. e. the one of 2007) obviuosly does not seem to > understand what he is doing (see that nonsense interrupt please, just > incredible!) :( > > In so far I would deeply appreciate Andrew Morton to throw that b44.c patch > into the trashbox as soon as possible :)
Uwe, you are an arrogant idiot and I think it's best for everybody to just ignore all your mails, regardless of their technical merits. Even if your mail reports a real bug, added shitload of insults to developers far outweights any possible useful info. Developers can save a lot of time and nerver by just waiting for someone else to hit the same bug, if it exists, and then debug it as usual. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
