Hi Christoph Thanks for your kindly response and directive
On 03/01/2018 12:47 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Note that we originally allocates irqs this way, and Keith changed > it a while ago for good reasons. So I'd really like to see good > reasons for moving away from this, and some heuristics to figure > out which way to use. E.g. if the device supports more irqs than > I/O queues your scheme might always be fine. maybe we could add a logic that when get enough irq vectors, assign separate irq vector to adminq, otherwise sharing. Sincerely Jianchao
