Hi Nitin, On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:27 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: > On 5/25/07, Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 17:15 +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote: > > > Richard, can you please provide perf. results for this patch also? > > > Also, can you please mail back latest version of your LZO patch? In > > > meantime, I will try to include benchmarking support to the > > > 'compress-test' module. > > > > This version is 15% slower at decompression and about equal on > > compression. > > If you don't mind, can you please try patch attached now? I have now > also rolled back that cpu_to_le16() change as Satyam suggested. I see > no other reason for this perf. loss as I made no other change!
I tested it with no real change in the results. Since I'm doing the tests on LE, cpu_to_le16() should a NOP anyway. > Also, can you please verify if you are comparing your _safe_ version > with this patch? This patch does not include unsafe version and the > safe one is simply called lzo1x_decompress(). Yes, I am comparing with my safe version. Cheers, Richard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
