On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:02:28PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > find below the cleanups from my first patch that didnt make it into > > > your cleanups. (plus one more cleanup i noticed while merging the > > > missing bits from my first patch) Goes after the bugfix i just sent. > > > Please apply. > > > > I cannot apply it as is because it changes code from the paravirtops > > patch too. > > ok - then please merge that single hunk into the paravirtops patch - and > leave the other 6 hunks in this patch.
I added the empty lines too. > > > BTW to nitpick the original formattings you changed are all probably > > standard code style and the new comment is a classical i++; /* > > Increase i */ > > could you please quote the portion from my patch that you are talking > about? -static int sc_freq_event(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, - void *data) +static int +sc_freq_event(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *data) and + /* + * Still no frequency? Then fall back to tsc_khz: + */ if (!freq->new) freq->new = tsc_khz; -Andi (who hopes this thread will end soon now and we can all go back to more important issues) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/