On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:39:33AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 13:05 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > On 5/25/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > call_r_s_f() still needs an urgent rerenaming though =B-) > > > > So does "call_r_s_f_here()" :-) > > That name makes me think of INTERCAL's 'DO COME FROM' statement. > And any code that makes one think of INTERCAL is say,.. special.. :-)
Propose a better way to code this then? It's not my fault that dealing with callbacks in C is so messy. _here just massages one callback prototype (smp_call_function's) into another (cpufreq's) because both callbacks do the same in this case. The r_s_f BTW stands for resync_sc_freq which is a function earlier in the file and should be familiar to a serious reader. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
