> > Making /dev/random block if the amount requirements aren't met makes sense
> > to me. If I request x bytes of random stuff, and get less, I probably
> > reread /dev/random. If it's entropy pool is exhausted it makes sense to be
> > to block.
> 
> This is the job of the program accessing /dev/random.  Open it blocking or
> non-blocking and read until you satisfy your read buffer.

Agree, if randomness is guaranteed in that case. I usually bail out in
that case. Time to change that :)

> -d


        Igmar

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to