On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > This check is racy but provides a good heuristic to determine whether > a CPU may need a remote tick or not. >
> +int tick_nohz_tick_stopped_cpu(int cpu)
s/int/bool/ but I'm not religious about that.
> +{
> + struct tick_sched *ts = per_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
> +
> + return ts->tick_stopped;
> +}
Other than that nit:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
