On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:28:12PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2007 10:25:01 +0200, > Cornelia Huck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I tried this on one of our internal drivers, which is based on FC 3 (or > > 4, can look this up). With s390 defconfig, it is unable to open the > > root device /dev/dasda1 (which is unsurprising, considering udev (063) > > decided to create /dev/dasda(1) as a character node instead of a block > > node). > > Just to be clear, it's fsck that complains: > > Checking filesystems > Checking all file systems. > [/sbin/fsck.ext3 (1) -- /] fsck.ext3 -a /dev/dasda1 > fsck.ext3: No such device or address while trying to open /dev/dasda1 > Possibly non-existent or swap device? > [FAILED] > > (so that is after udev has been started and obviously dasda1 could be > accessed)
But /dev/dasda1 isn't present? Or why would fsck be complaining here? > > When I look at the system, /sys/block/ and /sys/class/block/ look sane > > at first glance (working on a 3270 console is usally PITA...) > > > > Even more surprisingly, the system comes up fine (once I added ptmx to > > makedev.d/) with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED not set. /sys/block/ > > and /sys/class/block/ look just like expected. (Unfortunately, our > > lsdasd tool breaks with this...) > > > > I'll see if I can find out more. > > I currently have the inkling that > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 22 15:59 block:dasda1-> > ../../../class/block/dasda1 > > in /sys/block/dasda/ is the culprit. Why? > In all other versions I've tried (without CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED, and > on an older kernel with and without CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED), it's > always dasda1. That's just a back symlink, the real device should still be there. Oh, and yes, you will probably have to have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED enabaled to have a chance for these to work on Fedora 4 or 3. > I can continue investigating tomorrow, unless someone has a good idea :) I don't, but any information you can find out would be greatly appreciated, especially as it seems like it is working, but something is still a little bit wrong. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/